Direct answer: The latest notable development is that a federal judge in Rhode Island dismissed the DOJ’s effort to obtain unredacted voter data in April 2026, signaling a setback for the administration's attempts to access detailed voter rolls there. This follows a string of similar rulings in other states.
Key context and what it means:
- What happened: The U.S. Department of Justice pressed to obtain Rhode Island’s complete voter registration list, including private data, under federal election laws, but thejudge ruled against that broader request. This is described as a dismissal of the DOJ’s lawsuit seeking unredacted voter data. The ruling reflects privacy and state authority concerns around voter information.[3][7]
- Who was involved: Rhode Island Secretary of State Gregg Amore defended privacy and state control over elections, while the DOJ pursued the data under Civil Rights Act provisions and related federal statutes. The government’s position emphasized federal interests in ensuring compliance with federal election laws.[6][3]
- Scope and privacy: The decision highlighted concerns that requesting highly sensitive information (e.g., driver’s license numbers, partial SSNs) could infringe on voter privacy and raise risks of misuse, reinforcing states’ rights to regulate election processes.[7][3]
What to watch for next:
- Possible appeals or further filings: If either side seeks to appeal or modify the scope of data requests, there could be new developments, but the April 2026 dismissal reduces immediate DOJ leverage in Rhode Island.[7]
- Related actions in other states: Other states have faced similar DOJ interventions with varying outcomes; Rhode Island’s ruling is part of a broader pattern of federal courts scrutinizing broad data access claims.[3][6]
If you’d like, I can pull the most recent local coverage from Rhode Island outlets (e.g., WPRI, Providence Journal) for more granular timeline details and quotes, or summarize the legal basis the judge used in the April 16–17 timeframe. I can also put together a short timeline of key filings and rulings.
Sources
A federal judge in Rhode Island has dismissed the Trump administration's lawsuit demanding the state's unredacted voter rolls KNX News 97.1 FM
www.audacy.comRhode Island Secretary of State Gregg Amore said in September he would hand over the public voter list, but not the private data the DOJ was requesting
www.bostonglobe.comSecretary of State Gregg M. Amore is firing back at the United States Department of Justice’s lawsuit against him and his office of voter data.
www.golocalprov.comUS News is a recognized leader in college, grad school, hospital, mutual fund, and car rankings. Track elected officials, research health conditions, and find news you can use in politics, business, health, and education.
www.usnews.comA federal judge in Rhode Island has dismissed the Trump administration's lawsuit demanding the state's unredacted voter rolls. U.S. District Court Judge Mary McElroy on Friday sided with Rhode Island election officials and civil rights advocates, stating federal law doesn't allow such a "fishing expedition." The Justice Department declined to comment. The DOJ claims it needs the data for election security, but officials argue the demand violates privacy laws and are concerned it will be used...
www.ajc.comA federal judge in Rhode Island has dismissed the Trump administration's lawsuit demanding the state's unredacted voter rolls KCBS All News 106.9FM and 740AM
www.audacy.comA federal judge in Rhode Island has dismissed the Trump administration's lawsuit demanding the state's unredacted voter rolls
www.usnews.comLearn more here.
www.democracydocket.com