Josh Hazlewood vs Jasprit Bumrah: Who is the Better Bowler Across All Formats?
Josh Hazlewood delivered a match-winning performance in the 2nd T20I against India, sparking a debate on whether he is currently a better bowler than Jasprit Bumrah. At the MCG, Hazlewood's spell with the new ball was nearly unplayable, dismantling India's top order and leaving them struggling throughout the innings.
Hazlewood finished with impressive figures of 3 for 13 in four overs, claiming the wickets of Shubman Gill, Suryakumar Yadav, and Tilak Varma. His effort was pivotal in restricting India to a low total of just 125 runs.
India hoped their key pacer, Jasprit Bumrah, would bounce back and help chase down the target, but he struggled early on, conceding quick runs. Although Bumrah took two wickets and ended with 2 for 26, his impact was minimal in turning the game in India's favor.
"Bumrah is often projected as the best pacer of contemporary cricket; however, the comparison of the recent show from the two bowlers leads us to the question: Is Josh Hazlewood a better all-format bowler than Bumrah?"
When considering their overall careers across all formats, Jasprit Bumrah stands out as the more effective bowler, boasting superior averages and strike rates compared to Hazlewood.
Summary
Josh Hazlewood's recent brilliance in T20 cricket has raised questions about his standing against Bumrah, but Bumrah's overall career statistics still establish him as the more consistent bowler across formats.
Would you like the summary to be more detailed or concise?