A.J. Armstrong, 25, was convicted in 2023 for the 2016 murders of his parents, Antonio Armstrong Sr. and Dawn Armstrong, in their Bellaire-area home. He was 16 years old at the time of the crime.
A Texas appellate court recently ordered a lower court to hold a hearing regarding Armstrong’s case as his attorneys pursue a retrial.
The 14th Court of Appeals did not decide whether a new trial should be granted but found that the Houston district court “abused its discretion” by denying the defense a hearing on their motion for retrial.
The appeals court also refrained from ruling on whether a Brady violation occurred, instead stating that a hearing was necessary to determine if such a violation took place. A Brady violation refers to the prosecution’s failure to disclose evidence favorable to the defense during a trial.
During oral arguments, Armstrong’s defense attorney, Patrick F. McCann, argued that the state did not disclose a complaint filed against the prosecution’s expert witness. This omission, McCann stated, could have influenced the jury’s assessment of the expert’s credibility.
McCann requested either a retrial or, at minimum, a hearing to evaluate whether a retrial should be granted.
“The state failed to disclose a complaint filed against the prosecution’s expert witness, which could have affected the jury's ability to judge the expert's credibility.” — Defense Attorney Patrick F. McCann
Armstrong’s legal team remains focused on securing a retrial based on these procedural issues.
Author’s summary: The appellate court ordered a hearing on A.J. Armstrong's defense claim that key evidence was withheld, potentially impacting his 2023 murder conviction and opening the door for a retrial.