Ms. Farrant, who founded the Hands Off Our Marsh campaign, expressed doubts about the proposed Marsh Solar Park. She argued that the development poses risks to the local environment and landscape, stating that there are better alternatives to large-scale solar installations, describing them as “too intrusive for rural settings.”
Residents and campaigners have voiced fears that the project could alter the character of the area, which is valued for its biodiversity and open marshland. Opponents emphasize that renewable energy should not come at the expense of heritage and wildlife preservation.
Project representatives insist that the solar park will provide a vital source of clean electricity and contribute to national renewable targets. They claim that environmental mitigation measures will minimize the visual and ecological impact on the site.
“We are committed to balancing energy generation with respect for the local environment,”
said a spokesperson for the developers.
Public consultations and environmental assessments are continuing as both sides push for their vision of sustainable development. Local authorities will review all feedback before any final decision is taken on the project.
“This is not about opposing green energy,” Ms. Farrant noted, “but about choosing the right locations and technologies that do not harm our landscape.”
Author’s summary: Campaigners challenge the Marsh Solar Park project, arguing it threatens local nature and heritage, while developers defend it as an essential step toward renewable energy goals.